Glazier Injuries
Glass and Metal Work
Glaziers install, replace, and seal the glass-and-metal skin of buildings across New York City and Long Island.
Curtain wall panels, unitized systems, storefronts, spandrel glass, vision glass. The work happens from swing stages, mast climbers, scaffolds, and scissor lifts, often at extreme heights and in wind. District Council 9 and Glaziers Local 1087 represents glaziers in NYC and surrounding areas.
Labor Law § 240, Labor Law § 241(6), and Labor Law § 200 give injured glaziers rights that go beyond workers' compensation.
Schwartzapfel Holbrook represents glaziers across New York and Long Island. The firm handles both the workers' compensation claim and the third-party lawsuit on the same case team.
$26,500,000
For an operating engineer seriously injured in a car wreck
$24,750,000
For a union laborer who suffered a double leg amputation
$9,500,000
for an elevator apprentice struck by the cab
Connect with our team
Protect your Future
Common Accidents for Glaziers
Falls from elevation during curtain wall work. A glazier was caulking windows in a glass lobby at approximately 35 feet. The scissor lift could not be placed directly adjacent to the building because the V-shaped configuration prevented proper positioning. He was forced to lean over the railing to reach the work. He fell to the ground. The court found the scissor lift was clearly inappropriate for the task and granted summary judgment on § 240. (Hoffman)
Struck by and crushed by glass panels. Glass crates staged on a construction floor weigh 1,000 to 2,000 pounds or more. A crate that tips during loading, a panel that shifts during hoisting, or an IGU that cracks under stress during placement creates a struck-by or crush hazard. Workers have been killed by glass crates collapsing during A-frame staging.
Lacerations from glass breakage. Glaziers handle large, heavy glass panels by hand during final placement and finishing. Tempered glass can shatter without warning under thermal or mechanical stress. A broken panel on a swing stage at height turns a laceration into a fall hazard at the same time.
Wind hazards during curtain wall lifts. A glass panel being hoisted into a curtain wall opening acts as a sail. A sudden gust can wrench the panel from a vacuum lifter, pull a glazier off a platform, or slam a unit into the building frame. Wind protocols exist for a reason, and when they are ignored or the threshold is set too high, the glazier on the swing stage bears the consequence.
Musculoskeletal injuries and chemical exposure. Repetitive overhead caulking and sealing work breaks down shoulders, backs, and hands over years. Silicone sealants, primers, and isocyanate-based adhesives used in structural glazing create respiratory sensitization risks with prolonged exposure.
Important Information
Understanding which laws apply and what steps to take are key to protecting yourself
See Your Own Doctor, ER, or CityMD
30 Days to Report an Injury
Do Not Give Any Statements
File Workers' Comp to Cover Immediate Bills
New York Labor Law and Glazier Injury Claims
The strongest glazier claims arise from falls during curtain wall installation and struck-by injuries from glass panels.
Both produce § 240 claims with absolute liability on the property owner and general contractor. The critical legal point for glaziers is that the safety device does not need to be defective to trigger liability.
If the device is inappropriate for the task, that is enough. A scissor lift that cannot be positioned properly for a V-shaped building is an inadequate safety device even if the lift itself functions perfectly. (Hoffman)
Contractors will raise the defense of sole proximate cause: that adequate safety devices were available and the worker chose not to use them.
For glaziers on swing stages and mast climbers, the question is whether the contractor provided equipment appropriate for the specific building configuration, not just equipment that works in general.
For § 241(6) claims, the case strategy depends on the specific Industrial Code provision violated:
A glazier who fell from a swing stage cites 23-1.16 (safety belts and harnesses) and 23-5 (scaffolding).
A glazier struck by a falling glass panel cites 23-1.7(a) (overhead hazards).
A glazier injured by an improperly rigged curtain wall lift cites 23-6 (material hoisting).
A glazier cut by glass without proper PPE cites 23-1.8 (personal protective equipment).
OSHA classifies curtain wall installation under steel erection rules (29 CFR 1926 Subpart R), requiring fall protection at 15 feet. Controlled access zones are not permitted for curtain wall work per OSHA's 2010 letter of interpretation. This regulation strengthens the case when fall protection was not provided.
For § 200 claims, the question is whether the GC or property owner controlled the conditions that caused the injury. On curtain wall projects, the GC typically controls the crane schedule, the lift sequence, and the wind protocol enforcement.
When the GC's decision to proceed with a lift in marginal wind conditions results in a glazier being injured, the GC's control over that decision is the basis for liability.
The Two-Track Recovery for Glaziers
A serious glazier injury triggers two separate legal claims that run together.
You cannot sue your employer in New York. Workers' compensation is a claim you file through your employers insurance coverage. This is limited to medical treatment, lost wages at the statutory rate, and schedule loss of use.
The lawsuit is separate from Workers' Comp. The property owner, general contractor, and any other responsible party is who we file the claim against.
This is how we recover full damages: past and future lost earnings, pain and suffering, and medical costs beyond what comp covers.
The workers' compensation claim is filed against the carrier through your direct employer.
Workers' comp covers two-thirds of your average weekly wage, capped at the statutory maximum ($1,222.42 per week as of 2025). The comp carrier acquires a lien on the third-party recovery under Workers' Compensation Law § 29. The lien is negotiable and attorney-fee apportionment typically reduces the carrier's net recovery substantially.
Schwartzapfel Holbrook handles both tracks on the same case team. The workers' compensation claim and the third-party lawsuit are coordinated so that one does not undermine the other.
How Schwartzapfel Holbrook Handles Glazier Accident Cases
Our job is to make a difficult situation as easy as possible. Clients entrust us to secure their future, and that starts immediately.
When a glazier calls Schwartzapfel Holbrook, the investigation begins the moment the firm is retained.
The focus is on what the worker was doing at the moment of injury. This can be caulking a curtain wall from a scissor lift that could not reach the work area, setting glass from a swing stage with inadequate anchorage, or handling a glass crate that shifted during staging.
Evidence preservation is time-critical because swing stages get dismantled, scissor lifts get returned to the rental yard, and the glass panels get installed over the accident scene.
Site photos, witness identification, OSHA records, and the rigging and lift inspection records all need to be secured before the construction project moves on.
The third-party lawsuit and the workers' compensation case run together inside this firm, with the same team handling both. The comp lien gets negotiated as part of the settlement. The firm reviews the medical record as it develops through treating physicians' independent clinical findings, matching the documentation to the legal theories that apply under § 240, § 241(6), and § 200.
Every case the firm accepts is prepared as if it will go to trial. That level of investigation, record collection, legal analysis, and trial strategy has yielded consistent record results for over 45 years.
Frequently Asked Questions About Glazier Injuries
A glazier injury case arises when a glazier is hurt on a New York construction site due to unsafe conditions, defective equipment, or violations of the Labor Law. These cases typically involve falls from swing stages or scaffolds, struck-by injuries from glass panels, or lacerations from broken glass during installation. Under New York law, the property owner and general contractor can be held liable even if the glazier’s direct employer was at fault.
Any worker performing construction work on a New York building or structure is covered by Labor Law §§ 240, 241(6), and 200. This includes union glaziers in Local 1087 and DC9, non-union glaziers, and subcontracted glass workers. Coverage depends on the nature of the work being performed, not the worker’s employment status or immigration status.
Workers’ compensation is generally the exclusive remedy against your direct employer. You cannot sue your employer in most circumstances. However, you can file a third-party lawsuit against the property owner, general contractor, or other parties who controlled the job site or created the hazardous condition. The third-party case is where full damages, including pain and suffering, are recovered.
Section 240(1) applies to glaziers working at elevation, which includes nearly all curtain wall installation, window replacement, and exterior sealing work. It requires owners and general contractors to provide proper scaffolding, hoists, ladders, and other safety devices. When a glazier falls because the safety device was missing, defective, or inappropriate for the task, the owner bears absolute liability.
Section 241(6) requires all construction areas to comply with the Industrial Code. For glaziers, relevant regulations cover fall protection, guardrail requirements, safe storage of glass panels, and proper hoisting procedures. A violation of a specific, applicable Industrial Code provision creates a presumption of negligence without the need to prove the owner or GC was careless.
Section 200 imposes liability when a property owner or general contractor controls the means and methods of the glazier’s work, or when the injury results from a dangerous premises condition the owner knew about. For glaziers, this includes unsafe staging areas, defective building configurations that force workers into dangerous positions, and failure to address known hazards on the job site.
A glazier was caulking windows in a glass lobby at approximately 35 feet using a scissor lift. The V-shaped building configuration prevented the lift from being positioned adjacent to the work area, forcing the glazier to lean over the railing. He fell to the ground. The court granted summary judgment under § 240(1), finding the scissor lift was clearly inappropriate for the task at hand. (Hoffman v. SJP TS, LLC)
Swing stages are suspended platforms used for curtain wall installation and exterior glazing at height. Hazards include cable failure, motor malfunction, improper rigging, wind displacement, and lack of adequate tie-off points for personal fall arrest systems. A swing stage fall on a New York construction site typically triggers § 240(1) liability against the owner and GC.
Scissor lifts are used for interior glazing, lobby work, and lower-elevation exterior tasks. Hazards include positioning the lift on uneven surfaces, overreaching beyond the platform, operating near open edges, and using a lift that is inappropriate for the building configuration. The Hoffman case established that a scissor lift that cannot be properly positioned for the task creates § 240(1) liability, even if the equipment itself is not defective. (Hoffman v. SJP TS, LLC)
Glass panels and crates staged on construction floors can weigh 1,000 to 2,000 pounds or more. A crate that tips during loading, a panel that shifts during hoisting, or an IGU that cracks under thermal stress during placement creates a struck-by or crush hazard. NIOSH has documented glazier fatalities from glass crate collapses on active construction sites.
Glaziers handle large, heavy glass panels during placement, sealing, and finishing. Tempered glass can shatter without warning under mechanical or thermal stress. Broken glass on a swing stage at height creates a combined laceration and fall hazard. Cut-resistant gloves and sleeves reduce but do not eliminate this risk.
A glass panel being hoisted into a curtain wall opening acts as a sail. Sudden gusts can wrench a panel from a vacuum lifter, pull a glazier off a platform, or slam a unit into the building frame. Wind conditions at height can differ significantly from conditions at ground level. Contractors are responsible for monitoring wind conditions and stopping lifts when conditions exceed safe thresholds.
Yes. Under Labor Law §§ 240(1) and 241(6), general contractors share statutory liability with property owners for construction site injuries. The GC can be sued regardless of whether the GC directly supervised the glazier’s work. Under § 200, the GC can also be sued if it controlled the means and methods of the work or created the dangerous condition.
Workers’ comp is a no-fault system. An injured glazier files a C-3 form with the Workers’ Compensation Board. Comp covers medical treatment and a portion of lost wages. It does not require proving anyone was negligent. However, comp does not cover pain and suffering, full lost earnings, or loss of future earning capacity. Those damages come from the third-party lawsuit.
When an injured glazier receives workers’ comp benefits and also recovers money in a third-party lawsuit, the comp carrier has a statutory lien under Workers’ Compensation Law § 29. The carrier is entitled to recover the medical and wage benefits it paid out of the third-party recovery. This lien is negotiated as part of the settlement and directly affects the net amount the glazier takes home.
Case value depends on the severity of the injury, the extent of lost wages and future earning capacity, the medical treatment required, and the available insurance coverage. A glazier who suffers a permanent injury that prevents a return to the trade will have a different case value than a glazier who recovers fully after surgery. The firm evaluates each case on its specific facts. Prior results do not predict future outcomes.
The general statute of limitations for a personal injury case in New York is three years from the date of the accident under CPLR § 214. If a government entity owns the property where the injury occurred, a Notice of Claim must be filed within 90 days under General Municipal Law § 50-e. Workers’ comp has a separate filing timeline. Missing any of these deadlines can bar the claim entirely.
Report the injury to your foreman or supervisor. Get medical treatment from your own doctor or an emergency room. Take photos of the area where the injury happened, the equipment involved, and any visible injuries. Save the names of anyone who witnessed the incident. Do not sign documents from the general contractor or on-site medical unit without understanding what they say.
Yes. Under Workers’ Compensation Law § 18, you must provide written notice of the injury to your employer within 30 days. A text message to your foreman counts. Verbal notice alone is not sufficient. The written record establishes that the injury happened on this date, on this job, which protects your ability to file a comp claim later.
Your union membership does not change your legal rights under the Labor Law. You have the same right to file a workers’ comp claim and a third-party lawsuit as any other injured construction worker. Your union benefits, including health coverage and pension protections, continue during your recovery. The firm represents glaziers from Local 1087, DC9, and non-union shops.
Yes. These are two separate claims that run at the same time through different systems. The comp claim goes through the Workers’ Compensation Board. The third-party lawsuit goes through the courts. Most injured glaziers with a valid third-party claim pursue both tracks simultaneously. The firm handles both on the same case team.
A third-party lawsuit can recover damages that workers’ comp does not cover. This includes compensation for pain and suffering, full lost wages (past and future), loss of future earning capacity, loss of enjoyment of life, and the cost of future medical care. The specific damages depend on the severity of the injury and its impact on the glazier’s ability to work and live.
The Industrial Code is a set of regulations under 12 NYCRR Part 23 that set specific safety requirements for construction sites. Violations relevant to glazier work include failure to provide guardrails, inadequate fall arrest systems, improper storage of glass panels, and unsafe hoisting procedures. A proven violation of an applicable Industrial Code section supports a § 241(6) claim without the need to prove general negligence.
Section 240(1) liability does not require defective equipment. If the equipment provided was inappropriate for the specific task, the owner and GC are liable. In the Hoffman case, the scissor lift itself was functional, but the V-shaped building configuration made it impossible to position properly. The court found the lift was clearly inappropriate for the task at hand, establishing liability. (Hoffman v. SJP TS, LLC)
The firm assigns a case team that handles both the workers’ comp claim and the third-party lawsuit from intake through resolution. The firm reviews the medical record as it develops through treating physicians’ independent findings, identifies all potentially liable parties, and prepares every case as if it may go to trial. The firm represents glaziers across New York City and Long Island.
Under § 240(1), comparative fault is not a defense. If you fell because of a missing or inadequate safety device, the owner’s liability is absolute regardless of your conduct. Under § 241(6), your own negligence may reduce the recovery under New York’s pure comparative fault rule, but it does not bar the claim. Under § 200, comparative fault applies in full.