Imagine you’ve been working a grueling (12)-hour shift on a construction site. In the hustle and bustle, you get a call — it’s the courthouse. You missed your hearing about a claim over an on-the-job injury. Panic sets in: What happens now?Can the case continue without you even being there?

The legal term for this scenario is “in absentia.” It refers to legal proceedings that can potentially happen even if the defendant isn’t in the courtroom. Today, we’ll go into what this concept means, the specific situations where it may occur, and how it can affect your rights.

If you’re the defendant in a legal trial, it’s incredibly important to reach out to a qualified legal professional right away. To this end, you can schedule a free consultation with the experienced New York construction accident attorneys of Schwartzapfel Lawyers either online or by calling us at 516-342-2200 today.

No matter your situation, it will be our honor and privilege to fight for you!

What Does “In Absentia” Mean?

The Latin phrase “in absentia” simply means “in absence.” In law, in absentia means a court case or hearing can proceed even though the defendant isn’t present.

An in absentia proceeding can happen for a number of reasons, like if the defendant hadn’t been properly notified or they’re purposefully evading the court.

The idea of in absentia raises important questions about fairness and due process. Can a trial be truly just if you cannot defend yourself? How do courts balance efficiency with the protection of a defendant’s rights? These are complicated questions, and the answers have serious consequences.

What Is The Difference Between “In Absentia” In Criminal And Civil Proceedings?

The concept of in absentia trials forces us to confront a fundamental question: Does justice exist when the accused is missing from their own case? The answer depends heavily on whether you’re dealing with criminal or civil law — and even then, it’s rarely a simple black-and-white scenario.

Common Law vs. Civil Law

In common law systems, like those in the United States and the United Kingdom, the defendant’s presence in a criminal trial is viewed as sacred. It’s a core part of due process — the guarantee that you have the right to understand the charges against you, to confront your accusers, and to mount a defense.

Trials in absentia for criminal matters are incredibly rare and usually only allowed if a defendant deliberately flees the court’s jurisdiction. Civil law systems, like those commonly found in Europe and South America, typically employ a more flexible approach to in absentia proceedings.

While the defendant’s right to defend themselves is still respected, these systems place less emphasis on physical presence at trial. Under certain conditions, criminal and civil cases might move forward even if the defendant is absent.

To learn more about this now, speak directly with a Schwartzapfel Lawyers trial attorney by calling 516-342-2200 today. Alternatively, please continue reading.

When Can Criminal Cases Be Tried In Absentia?

The notion of trying someone for a crime in their absence feels instinctively wrong under a common law framework. How can someone fight charges they might not fully understand? How can they question witnesses or present evidence in their favor without being in the courtroom?

While rare, there are limited exceptions. If a defendant was initially present but intentionally disappeared mid-trial, the court might decide justice is best served by continuing the process rather than allowing the accused to manipulate the system with delays.

When Can Civil Cases Be Tried In Absentia?

Civil cases, such as those related to divorces, contracts, or property disputes, often revolve less around severe criminal penalties and more on resolving financial matters or liabilities. In this context, courts in both common law and civil law systems may sometimes greenlight proceedings even if the defendant is missing.

Of course, this isn’t a free pass for the plaintiff. Courts generally require proof that the defendant was properly notified of the case and given a reasonable chance to attend or find representation. If the judge isn’t satisfied with these efforts, the case might be stalled until the defendant can be located.

Balancing Justice And Practicality

Ultimately, in absentia proceedings reflect a delicate dance between ideals and reality. The protection of a defendant’s rights matters deeply.

However, courts cannot be held hostage forever by individuals who purposely disappear or try to game the system. Different legal frameworks around the world attempt to strike that balance, sometimes with controversial results.

What Are Natural Justice And Audi Alteram Partem?

A trial with only one side represented likely sounds wrong within the American legal framework. That’s because the very concept of justice hinges on the idea of natural justice — the bedrock principle that every person involved in a legal dispute deserves a fair and unbiased process.

One of the most crucial elements of natural justice is embodied in the Latin phrase “audi alteram partem,” which translates to “hear the other side.”

This concept means that both parties must have the opportunity to present their case, offer evidence, and challenge their opponent’s arguments. It’s the only way to ensure that a decision is based on a complete understanding of all the facts.

In absentia trials bring these principles into stark conflict. If the defendant isn’t there, how is their side of the story heard? How can they fully comprehend the accusations against them or offer a proper defense? These concerns lie at the heart of our right to due process.

For a free consultation on this or any personal injury matter you may be experiencing, call Schwartzapfel Lawyers now at 516-342-2200 or visit us online today!

When Are In Absentia Trials Permitted?

Rules regarding in absentia trials vary greatly between jurisdictions. However, we can examine some common circumstances where a court might allow a case to proceed in the defendant’s absence:

  • Flights From Justice: Perhaps the most clear-cut scenario is when a defendant has deliberately fled to avoid prosecution. Courts may not want to incentivize this kind of behavior by allowing an individual to halt the system at will.
  • Unknown Whereabouts: If reasonable efforts to locate a defendant have failed, a court might rule that the case can proceed. This often arises in civil matters where a defendant has simply disappeared.
  • Intentional Avoidance: Distinct from fleeing, some defendants might willfully disregard court orders and refuse to participate. In these cases, a judge may decide that efficiency outweighs indefinite delays.

Allowing in absentia proceedings is always a risky balance. Courts often implement strict rules to protect due process even when the defendant is absent.

These rules could include appointing a skilled lawyer to represent their interests, demanding stronger evidence, or allowing for appeals if the defendant later resurfaces.

Internationally, too, human rights conventions like the European Convention on Human Rights offer guidance on in absentia proceedings. Here, they emphasize that trials in a defendant’s absence should be carefully limited, with the option for a retrial if it turns out the person was unaware of the case against them.

What Are Common In Absentia Case Studies And Examples?

The concept of in absentia might seem abstract, but these cases aren’t just legal theory. They impact real people every day. Let’s examine a few instances where in absentia proceedings played a pivotal role in criminal and civil matters.

What Are Examples Of Criminal Cases Tried In Absentia?

In criminal law, the idea of a trial without the defendant present is inherently unsettling. Can someone truly face the full force of the justice system without being there to offer a defense? These cases often generate intense debate and highlight the profound challenges of balancing due process with the need to uphold the law. Let’s look at two cases:

Marc Rich

Marc Rich, a billionaire commodities trader, fled the United States in 1983 to evade charges of tax evasion, racketeering, and illegal trading with Iran. Despite his absence, he was convicted in absentia and sentenced to prison. In 2001, he received a highly controversial pardon from President Bill Clinton on his last day in office.

Paul Shanley

Paul Shanley was a central figure in the Boston Catholic Church’s abuse scandals. After facing allegations in the 1990s, he fled to California. Years later, in 2005, he was found, brought back to Massachusetts, and convicted in absentia on multiple charges.

These high-profile cases underscore how in absentia trials in criminal cases often spark intense public debate. Critics argue that justice cannot truly be served if the accused cannot offer a direct defense.

For more information at no charge, call Schwartzapfel Lawyers at 516-342-2200 or visit us online to schedule your free consultation today. Or, if you’d prefer to learn more about the subject first, please continue reading.

What Are Examples Of Civil Cases Tried In Absentia?

While criminal in absentia cases grab headlines, civil cases decided without the defendant’s presence might fly under the radar. Still, the consequences for the absent party can be significant and far-reaching. Below, we consider a couple of examples:

Missing Spouse

Consider a divorce proceeding where one spouse cannot be located despite reasonable efforts by the other party. While specific rules vary, in many cases, the court may grant a divorce in absentia, dividing assets and potentially assigning child support or custody arrangements.

This result can have life-altering implications for the absent spouse if they resurface years later without any legal recourse.

Unpaid Debt

If a business fails to pay you for services rendered and you take them to court, the owner could seem to vanish. While this scenario is rare, it could happen to you. If the judge finds the owner was properly served notice of the lawsuit but didn’t respond, a default judgment might be issued in your favor.

While collecting on that judgment might be another challenge entirely, it’s the first step in the process.

What Is The Fallout Of In Absentia Proceedings?

Whether it’s criminal or civil, being the subject of an in absentia decision can have serious consequences. Defendants might face convictions, hefty fines, warrants for their arrest, loss of property, or severely restricted parental rights.

In some cases, these judgments can be challenged or reopened, but the process is often difficult, and the outcome isn’t always guaranteed.

What Are Your Rights And Options If Your Case Was Tried In Absentia?

Finding out a case has proceeded without you likely feels like a punch to the gut. However, it’s important to remember that you still have options, but time is of the essence.

Responding If You Missed A Court Date

The absolute first step is to contact an experienced attorney immediately. Don’t try to take on this situation alone. A qualified lawyer can assess your specific circumstances and advise you on whether it might be possible to challenge the in absentia judgment or reopen the case.

Challenging In Absentia Judgments

Rules vary across jurisdictions, but there might be ways to appeal a decision made in your absence. Potential grounds for a challenge could include:

  • Lack of Proper Notice: If you never received official notification of the proceedings, that’s a strong argument for reopening the case.
  • Involuntary Absence: If you were unable to attend due to circumstances beyond your control (e.g., hospitalization, unavoidable travel), this might be considered valid grounds for challenging a decision.

Don’t feel powerless if a case has proceeded in your absence. The legal system provides avenues for appeal and potential recourse. A knowledgeable attorney like those at Schwartzapfel Lawyers can arm you with the information and guidance you need to fight back. Act now and dial 516-342-2200 today!

The Power Of Knowledgeable Representation

The legal system is intimidating even in the best of circumstances. In absentia situations add a whole new level of difficulty. Here, an experienced lawyer can protect your rights, potentially mitigate the consequences, and guide you through the process of seeking a new trial or appealing a judgment.

That’s why if you or someone you care about has been impacted by an in absentia proceeding, you shouldn’t hesitate to seek qualified legal help. And you can do so by contacting the skilled attorneys at Schwartzapfel Lawyers either online or by dialing 516-342-2200 today.

Contact Schwartzapfel Lawyers Today

While in absentia proceedings might be unavoidable in certain circumstances, they carry serious risks for defendants who are unable to defend themselves directly.

If you or a loved one is facing the consequences of a case decided in your absence, please know that you are not powerless. To this end, consulting with a skilled attorney is essential to understanding your complete options and using that knowledge to fight for the best possible outcome.

That said, you have a limited time to collect all the money and benefits you’re entitled to. So, please, don’t let legal proceedings happen without you.

Instead, act now and call the seasoned New York construction accident attorneys at Schwartzapfel Lawyers today. Dial 516-342-2200 or visit us online to set up your free consultation and/or case evaluation.

Your future is too important to leave to chance. Don’t delay, call today!

DISCLAIMER: Nothing on this page should be considered legal advice. You should seek the appropriate counsel your situation requires. For more information, call 516-342-2200 now!


Schwartzapfel Lawyers, P.C. | Fighting For You

Audi Alteram Partem; Note | NDLScholarship

Marc Rich, 2001 – Notorious Presidential Pardons | TIME

Paul Shanley, Ex-Priest in Child Sex-Abuse Scandal, Dies at 89 | The New York Times

Related Posts

We'll Fight For You

Conact us today at (516) 342-2200 of fill out the form below for a free case evaluation.

Schwartzapfel® Lawyers has a 99% Client Satisfaction Rate